Comments on: Objective-C for C++ Programmers http://sugarmaplesoftware.com/11/objective-c-for-c-programmers/ thoughts yet to be boiled down to their essence Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:31:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: geoff http://sugarmaplesoftware.com/11/objective-c-for-c-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-29 geoff Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:56:05 +0000 http://sugarmaplesoftware.com/11/objective-c-for-c-programmers/#comment-29 Ken, thanks for the feedback. What I had written was misleading at best. I've updated the entry accordingly. Ken, thanks for the feedback. What I had written was misleading at best. I’ve updated the entry accordingly.

]]> By: ken http://sugarmaplesoftware.com/11/objective-c-for-c-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-28 ken Sat, 14 Oct 2006 03:15:54 +0000 http://sugarmaplesoftware.com/11/objective-c-for-c-programmers/#comment-28 Useful post! > Unlike constructors, only the initializer for the most-derived > class in invoked by the run-time. I wouldn't phrase it like that.. the run-time doesn't have a concept of initializers. Initializers are methods like any other. The only thing that distinguishes them is our convention. Useful post!

> Unlike constructors, only the initializer for the most-derived
> class in invoked by the run-time.

I wouldn’t phrase it like that.. the run-time doesn’t have a concept of initializers. Initializers are methods like any other. The only thing that distinguishes them is our convention.

]]>